November 29, 2010

Letters To Juliet

2010 - 1/5

so i don't really feel like writing a full review for this movie.
very predictable
acting was below par
script was typical
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My moms' review of this movie:
"It was very, very good"

November 26, 2010

Eat Pray Love


2010 - 0/5

I had no intention to watch this movie (or even read the book); the only reason I rented it was because someone had recommended it to my mom.

Just when I thought Avatar was the worst movie I’ve ever seen in my life…
It’s a movie based on some chick’s life that is boring, and it fails to hold any interest. There were zero redeeming qualities in this movie; because it was so boring, the scenery/cinematography went unnoticed. The story line sucked, the characters sucked, this movie SUCKED! I watched the first 30-45 minutes and then I just put it on fast-forward. I can’t justify giving this movie anything more than a 0/5.

after having watched this movie, i am now more inclined to read
Drink, Play, F@#k: One Man's Search for Anything Across Ireland, Las Vegas, and Thailand
by Andrew Gottlieb
(which I'm currently reading; check out my book review blog!)
http://mmmcanehbr.blogspot.com/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My moms' review of this movie:
"it was very boring"
she did not like it; she fell asleep after 30 minutes and 'watched' the rest while on fast forward.

November 23, 2010

Exit Through the Gift Shop

2010 - 4/5

***SPOILER ALERT***

I heard about this movie one day and saw it the next. Once I found out it's a documentary on street art (graffiti) that includes Banksy, I knew I had to see it.

Although Thierry Guetta called himself a 'filmmaker' during an interview that was shown in this documentary, it is very clear that he is not; he is, and always has been, and always will be a guy with a camera in his hand. Considering Banksy is the director of this film, and that TG's film (also shown in this film SUCKED) should be evidence enough to prove my previous point.

The film starts out with an introduction to Thierry Guetta, a Frenchmen that films anything and everything. He then becomes obsessed with filming and documenting street artists in action; he also wants to film Banksy, an anonymous graffiti artist from London.

I liked Thierry Guetta when it started and as the movie progressed and he became Mr. Brainwash (MBW), an 'artist' himself, he also became arrogant and narcissistic. Banksy isn't looking for fame, he just wants people to see his art: that's why he does it on the streets for everyone to see and wants his identity kept a secret. Unlike Banksy, Thierry likes the star status and the fame that comes with; it seems as if the popularity got to his head. In my opinion, because Banksy remains elusive, his artwork has a lot more value to it than Guetta's and Banksy will always been seen as an artist, but Thierry is the flavour of the month, whose flavour will wear down as time goes on.

If this documentary itself was one of Banksy's creations, I think that that makes him that much more awesome!

November 21, 2010

Kicking It

2008 - 3/5

I love the idea of a tournament for homeless people and although this documentary was following the 4th annual Homeless World Cup it was the first I've ever heard of it! [unfortunately] - needless to say, I love soccer, so this documentary was a must watch for me.

The Homeless World Cup is an event made up of 500 players from 48 countries that gives drug addicts, alcoholics and people in war torn countries the opportunity to better themselves and their lives with a sport that brings the world together: football.

This film follows 7 participants: Damien & Simon from Ireland, Alex from Kenya, Najib from Afghanistan, Jesus from Spain, Craig from USA, and Slavan from Russia. It highlights each individual's hardships with having to deal with homelessness or poor living conditions in their own nations and in the meanwhile, trying to finish on top in the competition.

The documentary was well made and very well put together, but I wasn't able to feel connected to the 7 people; between the 7, I felt more drawn into the lives of Jesus, Slavan, Damien & Simon and I also thought that the documentary as a whole, would have made a greater impact on the viewer had it only focused on 4 people.

It's obvious that you're not about to watch an extremely skilled professional athlete compete; however the short 14-minute matches were just as intense and thrilling as a FIFA match. Regardless of who may be on the field, this documentary allows the viewer to put aside any prejudices and open their eyes about people living in poverty.

Taking into consideration that this documentary is linked with the worlds most popular sport, it would have been nice to have the option to watch some of the games in full (perhaps in the bonus features section); if more matches were added, the film as a whole could have been more heart wrenching and I would have felt a bond with one [or more] of the countries represented.

Documentaries have gained more and more attention throughout the years and it has become a good medium to illustrate certain issues around the world. The Homeless World Cup is an interesting way to create awareness of homelessness around the world by connecting it to such a beloved game. More importantly, it gave the participants a positive outlook on life and possibilities for and change in the future.

Lastly, I do have to mention that Colin Farrel only narrated the very beginning and the very end. His narration was somewhat pointless, but I guess his name being attached to this film draws in more people than it would have on its own.

November 20, 2010

Charlie St. Cloud

2010 - 2/5

one star for Zac Efron
one star for the scenery
this movie would be a great screen saver!

Plot: C-
Typical.

Script: C-
There were only 2 lines in the entire movie that I actually liked:
Tess: ‘You didn’t die in that car crash’
Charlie: ‘Actually, I did’

AND

Florio: ‘There’s no such thing as a lost cause’

Acting: B
Efron played the party very well; nobody else is worth mentioning.
It was kind of disappointing that Basinger and Liotta’s role’s combined, barley made 10 minutes of screen time – but then again, that just meant more ZE. ;)

Cinematography: A-
Beautiful British Columbia at its best – the forest, the ocean.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My moms' review of this movie:
"it was very boring"

November 19, 2010

Toy Story 3

2010 - 5/5

The Short: A+
Plot: A+
Script: A+
Voiceover Acting: A+
Animation: A+
Score: A+
Overall: A+

LOVED IT!!!
I expected nothing less than perfect from this movie, and it delivered!

November 18, 2010

The Expendables

2010 - 1/5

I had always wondered what an action movie would be like with the all the action movie stars, and that is why I decided to see this movie.

I don't even feel like writing a full review for this, so point form it is!

The Good:
-It did have a good cast, but the majority of them didn't have much screen time
-Got a few chuckles

The Bad:
-Each character in the movie was pretty much each actor playing his previous movie roles combined
-Even with all the fighting, shootings, and explosions, it was boring
-Stallones' attempt to show that he is still rough and tough (which didn't fly with me)
-Lousy script and weak plot
-Acting was mediocre
-The special effects sucked
-Really jumpy editing and bad directing

November 16, 2010

Hot Tub Time Machine

2010 - 1/5

Not sure how it is possible that you could copy several movies and end up with this crap. It was trying way to hard, but it just turned out so generic! I didn't go into this movie expecting a cinematic masterpiece, but even at the crude humour level, it still sucked. Some of the jokes were funny, but none had repeat value. There was nothing new or fresh about this movie; the director pretty much added anything and everything for shits and giggles - over the top usage of drugs, excessive cursing, uncalled for nudity, and not to mention poop, pee and puke! How this actually made it into theaters is beyond me, however, it crashing and burning I completely understand. I don't plan on watching this again, nor would i recommend it to anyone.

November 13, 2010

Where the Wild Things Are

2009 - 2.5/5

i was disappointed, which sucks because i really wanted to like this movie...where to begin... (POSSIBLE SPOILERS)

the bad: the wild things should have had more monster-like characteristics (they shouldn't have been so human-like; for example the voices) ...the kid max wasn't that great in this role... it's understandable that there was a sad aspect in the plot, but this was verging on depressing... i thought there were many pointless parts that could have been left out (for example the boulder fight, raccoon, hiding in the stomach) ...the story line wasn't similar to the book at all (but then again its a 10 page book)...

the good: the wild things (they looked amazing)

November 11, 2010

The Lovely Bones

2009 - 1/5

i didn't have a chance to read the book before i saw the movie (although i really wanted to, but school and work get in the way of life)... that being said, i'm not sure i was ready for all the 'fantasy' parts (the 'in-between' parts), i didn't see that coming. some of those parts were done well, and i enjoyed the editing going back and forth between susie and her dad (how the 'connection' they had was shown). acting was pretty good, tucci stood out the most. overall, it was a good movie, it did move at a slow pace, but i'm definitely going to read the book when i get a chance.

Update (April 2012):
I tried reading the book earlier this year and I couldn't get into it. I liked Alice Sebold's first book Lucky, but I only got to page 70 (?) of The Lovely Bones and it sucked, so I stopped reading it.

November 6, 2010

Dear John

2010 - 2/5

i haven't read the book, but i think it's fair to assume that it's gripping and the reader is drawn into the character, but the movie doesn't do that at all, probably because there wasn't any character development. i wasn't expecting much from this movie, mainly in terms of the acting, but it wasn't horrible, although the love between Savannah and John wasn't believable (the pair didn't click as actors). the movie should have focused a bit more on John and his dad (jenkins was solid, as usual). it was dull, and i just kept waiting for something major to happen, but i was let down. i liked the twist and how the movie ended.

November 4, 2010

The Woodsman

2004 - 2/5

***POSSIBLE SPOILERS ALERT***

The first thing I want to say about this movie is that it wasn't a bad movie, but it wasn't necessarily a good one either. The movie was well paced (but a bit slow at times) and well put together.

Plot: B
Kevin Bacon's character, Walter is a pedophile that was released from prison after serving a 12-year sentence. He is trying to put his life back together and integrate himself back into society, but the unpleasant nature of his crime doesn't sit well with people he encounters (mainly at his job in a lumber mill). This movie is about the barriers he has to face as an ex-con and his struggle for recovery.

It's obvious that Walter is trying to change and trying to become 'normal,' but at the same time, this movie also brings forth the question of whether society ought to let him do so. The way this movie is presented to the audience allows them to get a glimpse of peoples attitudes regarding pedophiles: the general public (mainly his coworkers), law enforcement (Sgt Lucas), his family (sister and brother in law) and victims (Robin). Even though most people have a preconceived notion that all pedophiles (or criminals in general) are 'bad people,' they usually fail to take into account the circumstances of each particular case; people have a tendency to jump to conclusions and never take the time to be objective.

The plot wasn't very engaging and I wasn't really drawn in. The only part that I felt on edge was during the scene (near the end) that Walter follows Robin down the trail and I was thinking 'how far will he take this?'

The subject matter of this movie shouldn't be taken lightly, so I would like to give credit to the director (Nicole Kassell) for taking on such an uncomfortable topic, as well as presenting it in a way that doesn't minimize or sensationalize the actions of pedophiles; it's not a typical Hollywood flick.

Script: C
The script for this movie could have been something very powerful, but it wasn't as gripping as you'd expect. My favourite line was said during Walter's conversation with his therapist and they were talking about a merry-go-round: "by going in circles we see things we miss the first time around." There were some other good lines that were said by Sgt. Lucas (Lucas: "you don't mind if I look around, would you?" / Walter: "I would" / Lucas: "why? you got something to hide?" /Walter: "doesn't everybody"), but the majority of the dialogue seemed overdone and pretentious.

Acting/Characters: B
Although a lot of reviewer on IMDB stated that Kevin Bacon did a really good job with the character, I wouldn't say he did - I just couldn't get past seeing KB's portrayal of the character Walter, rather than the character itself. Walter isn't a likeable character, but I did pity him. The viewer knows he wants to change and wants to be 'normal' but it's hard to feel any sympathy for him mainly because of what he did.

Vickie (Kyra Sedgwick) had her own emotional baggage (from childhood) and was pretty much as damaged as Walter, and that's why the two characters clicked together very well. The scenes that included the both of them were the most genuine scenes in the entire movie and were the most believable.

Sgt Lucas (Mos Def) was an irritating character that would pop up randomly every now and then. He was overly pushy and extremely judgmental, but then again, that does fit in only because he was in a position of authority. I don't really get why Mos Def is so praised for his role in this movie, but that's probably because I didn't like his character.

Benjamin Bratt was Walter's brother in law (Carlos). He didn't have a huge role in this movie, but he played the part well. It was interesting to see that Walter had a better relationship with his brother in law than his own sister.

I was kind of surprised that Robin (Hannah Pilkes) didn't have a bigger role and I was also hoping there would be another encounter between Walter and Robin, but the movie ended somewhat suddenly, so that didn't happen. I'm not a huge fan of child actors because they have a tendency to fail miserably - I wouldn't say she failed, but her performance was nothing noteworthy.

The only time the audience got to see things from Walter's perspective was when he went to his therapist Rosen (Michael Shannon). The scene that Walter had his eyes closed and opened them and Rosen was behind him and Walter screamed at him saying, "What are you doing back there? I want you back in your chair now" was kind of pathetic and I found myself wanting to laugh; I'm sure that's not the reaction the director wanted the viewer to have, but there was no chemistry between the two so any interaction between those two was cliché, dull and forced.

Eve is a rapper (questionably), and she should have stuck with music. I'm sure there were many more qualified people that could have played the part of a receptionist much better than she did (even though it was a small role).

While looking out his window at the school across the street, Walter notices another pedophile whom he calls 'Candy' because he tries to lure young boys into his car with candy. I can't tell if the director meant to portray this character in such a stereotypical manner, however, I did like the scene that Walter gives a play by play (like a commentator) of 'Candy' trying get a kid to go into his car.

Cinematography: B+ The type of shots used and the dim lighting was very well done (and probably my favourite thing about this movie) - these things added so much to the mood of the movie and the whole notion of isolation. The medium shots used helps the audience recognize how restricted his view of the world was. The dim lighting presented Walter's bleak existence and the enclosed spaces resemble his internal struggle. Although he is free from prison, his freedom is still limited physically and mentally: physically because most of the shots were in his apartment or when he was looking outside his window. And mentally because he is still in his own prison because he doesn't consider himself 'normal' and he can't escape his own thoughts.

I did like the symbolism of Little Red Riding Hood that was tied into the movie. The only bright colour that appeared in the movie was red (the ball and Robin's jacket), which happens to be the colour that depicts danger. I liked the irony regarding Robin's name and her hobby of bird watching and her inability to 'fly away' from being abused by her father, and almost falling prey to Walter.

Soundtrack: N/A
I only remember 2 songs and they both fit well with the scene. Nothing gained, nothing lost.

Overall: B
There is no sense of time and space throughout the entire movie, therefore it felt as if it was all over the place. It was hard to tell how many days or months had passed by (for example, when Walter was trying to meet up with his sister).

The result of having a few of the characters being offenders or victims (Walter/'Candy' and Vickie/Robin) was overly exaggerated (could have been intentional), which made that aspect repetitive and diluted. I felt as if the premise of the movie lost all meaning and turned out ineffective by the end.

There were too many loose ends and many segments of the movie remained underdeveloped. We never really got to know what those random scenes were (a child walking in the woods, and an adult following (?); the red ball that rolled towards Walter next to the fence at the school; the girl in Walters apartment; ect). Were they delusions in Walter's head, or events that had occurred previously? They were left unexplained, and somewhat unnecessary.

Lastly, I liked how it didn't have a typical 'happy ending' because, with this subject matter, there usually isn't a happy ending!

November 3, 2010

Shutter Island

2010 - 1/5

***SPOILER ALERT***

Although I was able to figure out the big twist (if you can call it that) the first time I saw the trailer, I was still eager to see it because I like Leo D, and Scorsese has directed a lot of good movies. I didn't think I could go wrong with this one. Considering I knew the 'what', the trailer didn't give away the 'why', so I thought it would still be worth watching. I also heard that Ruffalo's acting gives it away as well (it does, unless you're completely oblivious). None of the smaller aspects of the movie clicked together. I wanted it to be more eerie and tense. It was a let down to say the least.

Plot: C-
The movie is set in 1954, and US Federal Marshall Teddy Daniels (DiCaprio) and his new partner Chuck Aule (Ruffalo) are assigned to investigate the disappearance of a patient/criminal in a facility for the criminally insane on an isolated island. To me, this was an original plot (although other reviews I've read have stated that it is similar to other movies). There were so many directions this could have gone in; instead, Scorsese took the most boring and disinteresting route.

Script: D
The screenplay was something that should have been extraordinary - it wasn't. The one and only line I liked in the screenplay was courtesy of nurse Marino: 'This is mental institution, Marshall, for the criminally insane. 'Usual' isn't a big part of our day.'

Acting/Characters: C
Kingsly + DiCaprio + Ruffalo = a good cast; that's pretty much the only positive thing I have to say about that. Leo DiCaprio does a good job as Teddy, and he is believable as that character, but the actual character itself isn't very interesting; it remained very neutral. As I mentioned earlier, Ruffalo's acting (as Chuck) gave away the twist and it just seemed as if it was being forced and he wasn't convincing. As for Teddy's wife, Dolores, her parts were so boring to watch, and considering Teddy's mental instability started with issues with her, you would expect a strong emotional attachment, but it just seemed empty and void. There was no build up of tension between characters (mainly Teddy and the hospital staff), which is unfortunate because that's what you'd expect from this type of movie. The characters aren't supposed to like each other, and they're supposed to get under each other's skin, but nadda!

Cinematography: D
There are some nice shots, but nothing outstanding. Any shot in which Teddy was on the cliff did look nice. The first shot on the boat going to the island looked staged. Most of the shots were up close, or in enclosed spaces.

Score/Sound Effects: F
Wow, I did not like the music/score at all. It seemed as if the music wasn't paired well with what was on screen at all! When there should have been music, there wasn't and when there was, it just didnt fit. The score could have had so much impact on the viewer and added to the intensity (not that there was much intensity) of what was on screen. The lack-there-of of any sound effects was disappointing; it was the perfect atmosphere for such thing.

Overall: F
Throughout the entire movie, I got an unrealistic vibe. One part that really bugged me was Teddy's exceptional ability to climb up and down a vertical cliff - he climbed up and down that [vertical] cliff with ease. This would have been a perfect moment to add intensity to the movie; but no, it seemed as if he was walking up and down stairs.

The wife popping up so often became excessively redundant; she was a hallucination - we get it - move on! The dream sequences (with his family/during wwii) were too flashy and overdone. It really didn't add to the overall emotion of the movie. Unfortunately the only thing it did add was unnecessary minutes.

I really wanted to like this movie, however, I couldn't get into it and it fails to hold any interest at any point. I was expecting to see some information surface that would have a greater impact in terms of surprises, and twists that I hadn't seen coming; that never happened. The trailer came off as a mysterious, psychological thriller - overly promised and under-delivered. It wasn't as dark and dreary as I expected it to be. Instead of getting better, it got worse - a swing and a miss (by far, might I add).

November 2, 2010

Karate Kid + Video Review

2010 - 3.5/5

VIDEO REVIEW: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpmlpMqUq7g

***SPOILER ALERT***
After so many years, this movie manages to stays true to the original of 1984. There are some parts that pay homage to the original, for example, the "jacket on, jacket off" being the new "wax on, wax off." I liked how the director acknowledged that the martial art Dre was learning was Kung Fu and not Karate; it was mentioned a few times in the movie and it was added into the dialogue (twice) in a subtle way. Obviously, this storyline isn't anything new by any means, but it is a modernized version of the original Karate Kid and it's worth the watch.

Plot: B+
12 year-old Dre Parker (Jaden Smith) moves from the US to China with his mom Sherry (Taraji Henson) because she had to relocate for her job at a car manufacture. It is a completely different environment than he's used to. He befriends a girl named Meiying (Wenwen Han) on his first day there, and things seem to be going smoothly; however, after taking a beating from some local kids (Cheng and friends), Dre is less than pleased with the move, and the fact that his mom wants him to learn and accept the customs and the language. Mr. Han (Jackie Chan), the maintenance man in Dre's building begins to teach Dre kung fu, so Dre can earn the respect of Cheng in an upcoming tournament.

A reviewer on IMDB stated that "the bullies remain underdeveloped and their motive is never explained; we are left to assume it was because he is the new kid?; I think that the motive was that Cheng and Meiying's parents were really close, so Cheng was looking out for her; regardless of whether or not you think there was/wasn't a motive, I personally didn't think that it took anything away from the movie; I still felt a realistic dislike between Dre and Cheng, so Chengs' true motive wasn't really an issue for me.

Script: B+
I really liked the script and it should be obvious that there will be motivational speeches (some funny, some serious): "There are no bad students, only bad teachers" and "your focus needs more focus."
There are valuable life lessons entangled in kung fu - Mr. Han states in one of his lines, that kung fu lives in everything we do (or something to that effect).
After Dre's first encounter with Cheng, it was his intention to learn kung fu as a means of revenge, however, Mr. Han's motivational speeches stresses the importance of respect, which changes Dre's motives, and in the end, he stood up to the challenge for the right reasons; Mr. Han: "You've already accomplished everything you wanted to. Why do you still want to fight?" / Dre: "Because win or lose, I don't want to be afraid any more. And I'm still afraid."
One of the most powerful moments of the movie had no dialogue at all; the scene that Dre walks into Mr. Hans house and sees the smashed car with Mr. Han in the driver seat crying, and Dre says nothing, but his actions speak louder than words in that moment.

Acting/Characters: B
It is evident that Jaden Smith did a lot of kung fu training to prepare for this movie; I was weary of his acting ability, but he was spot on! He genuinely seems frustrated with the situation he has been put in; whether he had to be upset, scared, annoyed, hurt, he did everything so well. He had such a strong presence on screen, and there were some points in which I saw his dad in him; he really does have the same mannerisms as his dad, Will Smith. He's also a great dancer and those scenes were fun to watch. He put a lot of effort into becoming this character, and it really paid off! (Side-note: it wasn't pleasant watching a 12 year-old getting beat up - Dre did get pretty roughed up at some points; but then again, it's a Hollywood movie and it did seem as if a double was used in at least one scene).

Jaden Smith wasn't the only person on screen that had a strong presence; as far as I know, this was Chan's first dramatic role, and he held his own and nailed his character dead on! His facial expressions, tone of voice and body gestures solidified the very essence of his character. It's nice to see he can still do martial arts and kick some ass.

To be completely honest, I was skeptical of Wenwen Han (Dre's crush) and Zhenwei Wang (Dre's bully). Not only did both suit their parts really well, they both also presented their characters in a very believable manner. Taraji Henson portrayed her character Sherry (Dre's mom) very well too; she didn't have a huge role in this, but each part with her in it had an impact.

Cinematography: A
The 60 days spent filming in China contributed to the cinematography in a big way. There are so many attractions that were wonderfully shot: the Forbidden City, the Great Wall, and the Shaolin Temple! These attractions made for beautiful shots. Even the large field with the young kids training (in the red outfits) was filmed very well.

All the fight scenes seemed so realistic; every hit, jump, and move was very well choreographed. The movements were so fluid that it was easy to see everything that happened. The replays of the major hits during the tournament were short and sweet and highlighted the technicality of each move; although I have to add, that there were no scenes that showed Mr. Han teaching Dre the cool kicks or the slide during the tournament.

Soundtrack/Sound Effects: B+
Has really good songs by John Mayer, Flo Rida, and yes, even Justin Bieber! The sound effects were perfect; they were added in at the right times and didn't seem fake or overdone.

Overall: B+
Although it was really similar to the original, it kept my interest the entire time. The audience got to see the relationship between Dre and his mom, Han, and Meiying develop so it was worth the run time that was just over 2 hours. There are quite a few life lessons that are relayed in this movie. Pretty much everyone in this movie learns a lesson: Dre, Sherry, Mr. Han, Cheng, Meiying, and even Meiying's dad!

November 1, 2010

Step Up 3D

2010
4/5 - dancing + music
0/5 - plot, script, acting

***SPOILER ALERT*** (not that it matters)

So although this movie is called Step Up 3D, the theater I saw it in didn't have it available in 3D.

I do want to mention that I don't have a lot of time to write a full review on my own, so anything in quotes was taken from reviews I've read on IMDB

Plot/Script/Acting: F
"First of all, remember folks, that dancers aren't actors. And apparently no one was a writer either because the script sounded like it was written in about 10 minutes."

The storyline is very similar to Step Up 2 the Streets: a dancing crew trying to beat a rival dancing crew to win a contest, in which the prize money will be used to prevent the foreclosure of a dance studio (?) that Luke invested in to keep the memory of his parents alive (bc they were both dancers).

I got a lot of unintended laughs because of the dialogue; for example, when Luke is telling Natalie about his parents that have passed away, which was supposed to be an emotional part of the movie, my friend said "did they die dancing?" After that comment, I could not stop laughing!

Random points:
If Luke and Julien were good friends, wouldn't you think that Luke would have known that Julien had a sister? And who else guessed that Natalie was Julien's sister? That couldn't have been more obvious - well, the entire movie was very predicable.
"Moose and his bff have a more convincing romantic storyline than their two older counterparts."

Dancing: A+
The choreography was amazing and the people from SYTYCD are phenomenal dancers! The outfits were colourful and really flashy (during the last dance). The dances were so creative and I liked how some of the dances were on the streets and some were on a stage and especially the one with water. I really enjoyed the 'musical number' between Moose and Camille too.

Soundtrack: A-
The music was good; the beats were new and fresh.

Overall:
In general, since the first Step Up the acting, plot and script has deteriorated, BUT the soundtrack and especially the dancing has gotten better and better.